It is appropriate
to convene the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw session at least once a year

YANGON, 2 Jan — The following is the suggestions of National
Unity Party read out by U Tun Yi of the party on detailed basic principles for
legislation of Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Pyithu Hluttaw, Amyotha Hluttaw, and Region
or State Hluttaws to be included in the State Constitution at the plenary
session of the National Convention held today in Nyaunghnapin Camp, Hmawby
Township, Yangon Division.
A detailed basic principle says: “The first session of the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall be held within 15 days after the beginning of the first
session of the Pyithu Hluttaw. The Speaker of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall
convene the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.” As the administrative, judicial and financial
sectors come into force with the approval of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, the first
session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw should be held as soon as possible. Thus, the
NUP finds the basic principle appropriate. Concerning the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw
regular sessions, a detailed basic principle says, “The Speaker of the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall call the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw session at least once a
year. The maximum time limit between one meeting and another should not exceed
12 months”. As the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker shall call a special session,
emergency session when the President informs the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker or
when at least one fourth of the total number of members of the Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw ask to convene the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, it is appropriate to convene the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw session at least once a year. The NUP has no further
suggestions concerning the nine tasks of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw as they are in
conformity with the nation’s objective conditions. The NUP finds the basic
principle “The Speaker of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall call a special session or
an emergency session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw as necessary” appropriate as it
supports the work facilitation of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw. The party found the
detailed basic principles “The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker shall convene a
special session or an emergency session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw soonest when
the President informs the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker to convene a special
session or an emergency session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw” and “The Speaker of
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall convene a special session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw
when at least one fourth of the total number of members of the Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw ask to convene the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw” serve the interest of the
majority.
The following detailed basic principles:
(a) “The first day session of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall be
valid if more than half the number of members, who have the right to attend the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw meeting, are present. The meeting if invalid, shall be
adjourned.”
(b) “The meetings that are adjourned due to invalidity
according to with the sub para (a) as well as the valid meetings that are
extended will be valid if at least one third of the Hluttaw members are
present.” represent the democratic practice and help avoid work delays. The NUP
supports the two detailed basic principles.
The NUP finds the detailed basic principle “(a) Save as
otherwise provided by this Constitution, a matter that should be decided through
voting, shall be determined by a majority of votes of the members present and
voting” and “(b) The Speaker of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw or the Deputy Speaker
acting as such, shall not vote in the first instance, but shall have and
exercise a casting vote in the case of an equality of votes” appropriate for the
constitution.
Concerning the detailed basic principle “If for a period of
15 consecutive days a member of Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is without permission of the
Speaker absent from all meetings of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Speaker shall inform
the Hluttaw concerned to take action against the member according to the
prescribed rules. Provided that in computing the said period of 15 days on
account shall be taken of any period during which the Chamber is prorogued, or
is adjourned.” sometimes a member will find it difficult to inform the Speaker
about his absence if natural hazards like landslides or floods occur. Thus, the
Convention should consider extending the permitted period to 30 days.
As the detailed basic principle “Although there are vacant
seats, the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall have the right to carry out its tasks.
Moreover, the session shall not be annulled, if the acts of some person who was
not entitled to do so sat or vote or took part in the proceedings are discovered
later” is for the Hluttaw to continuously carry out its functions for the
interest of the nation and people.
“The functions and records of Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall be
published for public information. But the functions and records restricted by a
law or decisions of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall not be published.” The NUP
views the detailed basic principle appropriate.
The NUP also seconds the detailed basic principle “(a) The
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall have the right to make laws for the whole or any part
of the Union concerning the matters stated in the Union Legislative List.” “(b)
If a bill initially presented at the Pyithu Hluttaw or the Amyotha Hluttaw is
approved by both Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw, it shall be presumed that
the bill is approved by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.” “(a) When the Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw enacts a law, it shall —
(i) entrust the right to issue rules, regulation and bylaws
concerning the law to the Union level organizations formed according to the
Constitution.
(ii) authorize the respective organizations or authority to
issue notifications, orders, directives and procedures.
(b) The rules, regulations, notifications, orders, directives
and procedures issued with the right vested by an Act shall be consonant with
the stipulations contained in the Constitution and the law concerned.
(c) If both the Pyithu Hluttaw and the Amyotha Hluttaw decide
to annul or amend any one the rules, regulations or bylaws, it shall be presumed
that the rules, regulations or bylaws are annulled or amended by the Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw.
(d) If there is any disagreement between the Pyithu Hluttaw
and the Amyotha Hluttaw concerning the said rules, regulations or bylaws, it
shall be decided by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.
(e) If a decision is made to annul or amend any of the rules,
regulations or bylaws according to the para (c) or para (d), the decision shall
be without prejudice, however, to the validity of any action previously taken
under the rules, regulations or bylaws.”
In the NUP’s view, the para (e) fails to mention the
responsibility concerning the mistake whose consequences may have adverse
effects on the nation and the people. The fact that whether the mistake is
committed innocently or not and whether the mistake does have adverse effects on
the nation and the people should be considered.
The NUP has no further suggestions concerning the detailed
basic principle “The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall —
“(a) give the decision on matters in connection with
ratifying, cancelling and withdrawing from international agreements, regional
treaties or bilateral agreements submitted by the President.”
“(b) fix the international, regional or bilateral agreements
that do not need Pyidaungsu Hluttaw’s approval and delegate the President to
ratify, cancel and withdraw from them.”
In the NUP’s view, the detailed basic principle “(a) Of the
matters included in the Union legislative list, the Union level organizations
formed under the Constitution, shall have the right to submit bills on matters
under their management, to the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw in accord with the rules. (b)
Bills on national plans, annual budgets and taxation, which are to be submitted
exclusively by the Union government shall be presented to the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw
in accord with the prescribed provisions for decision.” appropriate.
The NUP finds the detailed basic principle “Except the bills
that are prescribed by the Constitution to be discussed and decided exclusively
at the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, the bills submitted by the Union level organizations
formed under the Constitution, to the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall be discussed
initially at the Pyithu Hluttaw or the Amyotha Hluttaw according to the
prescribed provisions.” appropriate as it defines the functions and rights
sector-wise.
The detailed basic principle “If the need arises to
scrutinize the bills, that are to be discussed and approved exclusively at the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, they are to be scrutinized jointly by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw
bill committee and the Amyotha Hluttaw bill committee, and the bills together
with the findings and comments of the joint committee can be submitted to the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw in accordance with prescribed provisions.” is to scrutinize
the bills before presenting them to the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw. It is an appropriate
principle.
The detailed basic principle “If there arises disagreement
between the Pyithu Hluttaw and the Amyotha Hluttaw concerning a bill, the bill
should be discussed and approved at the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.” for solving
disagreements. Thus, it is a suitable principle.
The party has no further suggestions on the detailed basic
principle “(a) Within 14 days after the date the President receives the bills
sent to him by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw after approving them and the bills in like
manner as if the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw have approved them, he shall sign the bills
and shall promulgate them into law.”
“(b) The President shall send a bill back to the Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw together with his comments within the fixed time to sign and promulgate
it into an Act.”
“(c) Although the President does not send a bill back to the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw together with his comments within the fixed time, if the Bill
is not signed by the President within 14 days after the date of presentation,
the same shall become an Act in like manner as if he had signed it on the last
of the said 14 days.” The NUP has no further suggestions on the detailed basic
principle 21.
The detailed basic principle “The Acts signed by the
President and the Acts deemed to have been signed by the President shall be
promulgated in the gazette. The Act shall come into force on the date of such
promulgation unless the contrary intention is expressed.” is found to be
appropriate.
In NUP’s view, the detailed basic principle “Members of the
organizations representing the Union level organizations formed under the
Constitution while attending the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw with the permission of the
Speaker shall explain the bills and other matters in connection with their
respective organizations.” helps facilitate the work of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw
and the organizations concerned. Thus, it is an appropriate principle.
The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker has four main functions which
reflects his important role in successful convening of the Hluttaw sessions.
Thus, the detailed basic principle concerning the Speaker’s functions are
appropriate. The fact that Union level organizations can make submissions
concerning their work only with the approval is also appropriate. The detailed
basic principle “The Union level organizations formed under the constitution
shall submit their general condition, necessary to be presented to the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, with the permission of the Speaker.” is aimed at
facilitating the functions of the Union level organizations. Thus, it is an
appropriate principle.
The NUP supports the detailed basic principle “(a) Subject to
the provisions contained in the constitution, and the provisions stipulated in
the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw law, members of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw shall have freedom
of speech and voting at the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw and the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Joint
Committee. Concerning the discussions and functions of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw
and the Joint Committee, a Pyidaungsu Hluttaw member shall be absolutely
privileged, except under the laws of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.”
“(b) Subject to the provisions contained in the constitution,
and the provisions stipulated in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw law, members of
organizations or persons representing any one of the Union level organizations
invited to attend the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw have the freedom of speech. No action
shall be taken against such persons for their speeches, except under the law of
the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.”
“(c) However, if the persons mentioned in the above para (a)
and para (b) commit physical assaults, they shall be liable to punishment
according to the existing law.” But the party would like to suggest to state the
para (c) as follows:
“However, if the persons mentioned in the above para (a) and
para (b) commit physical assaults, they shall be liable to punishment according
to rules and regulations of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw and the existing law.”
As the detailed basic principle “If there arises a need to
arrest a Pyidaungsu Hluttaw member attending a Pyidaungsu Hluttaw session or a
person attending the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw session at the invitation of the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker, the reliable evidence shall be submitted to the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker. He shall not be arrested without prior permission of
the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw Speaker.” gives protection to the members and invited
delegates of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, it is an appropriate one.
The detailed basic principle “The reports, papers and hluttaw
records published by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw or under its authority shall be
privileged.” guarantees freedom of publication and gives much assistance to the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw members. Thus it is an appropriate principle.
Concerning the Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw, the Work
Committee has presented 92 points— 19 detailed basic principles including sub
paras. As the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw is formed with the Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha
Hluttaw, the functions of all the three hluttaws have connections. My
suggestions on laying down of the detailed basic principles for the Pyithu
Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw will have connections with my submission concerning
the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.
As there may be difficulties for the Pyithu Hluttaw members
to inform the Speaker about their absence within 15 consecutive days, the period
should be extended to 30 days. Systematic investigation should be made to know
whether the cause of his absence is due to himself or due to unexpected natural
disasters.
The detailed basic principles for legislation of Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw, Pyithu Hluttaw, Amyotha Hluttaw and Region and State Hluttaws,
presented by Chairman of the National Convention Convening Work Committee are
found to be in accord with the nation’s objective conditions. The Work Committee
presented them after thoroughly studying the constitutions of the world nations,
the 1947 Constitution and the 1974 Constitution. The detailed basic principles
are also within the framework of the six objectives of the National Convention
and 104 basic principles laid down by the Convention.
Thus detailed basic principles concerning the legislation of
the hluttaws at all levels presented by the Work Committee Chairman are
appropriate for the constitution. The NUP would like to make a request to
consider its suggestions as necessary for the interests of the nation and
people.
A detailed principle states “The first session that gives
birth to the tenure of the Pyithu Hluttaw shall be convened not later than 90
days after the commencing date of general elections”. Besides, the Pyidaungsu
Hluttaw shall be convened 15 days from the date the Pyithu Hluttaw comes into
force. An appropriate length of time is required for convening the first session
of the Pyithu Hluttaw. Hence, the detailed basic principle is suitable for the
Constitution.
Moreover, a detailed basic principle said, “The first session
of the Amyotha Hluttaw shall be launched not later than seven days after the
start of the tenure of that Hluttaw” is also appropriate. The detailed basic
principles from paras 2 and 3 are comprehensive. The party has no further
discussions concerning them. Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw members may face
difficulties in informing about their absence to the Speaker within 15 days due
to various reasons. Thus the period should be extended to 30 days. Systematic
investigation should be made to ascertain whether the absence without leave is
due to the member himself or due to natural disasters or unexpected reasons.
Detailed basic principles concerning vacant seats, releasing of records,
submission of bills of the Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw, distribution of
bylaws and rules and regulations issued by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, presentation
of matters that caused disagreement between the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw and the
Amyotha Hluttaw are comprehensive, and the party has no further discussion on
them.
Concerning the physical assaults of the members,
consideration should be made according to the party’s submission concerning the
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw. The detailed basic principles (a) No person shall be liable
to in respect of reports, publications and records published and distributed by
or under the authority of the Pyithu Hluttaw: and (b) No person shall be liable
to in respect of report, publications and records published and distributed by
or under the authority of the Amyotha Hluttaw” are appropriate.
The detailed basic principles for convening of the first
session of the Region or State Hluttaw, taking of the oath of the Hluttaw
members, the minimum number of hluttaw session per year, convening of special
and emergency sessions, functions of the Region and State Hluttaws, validity of
the meeting and voting are comprehensive and in conformity with the related
points of the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Pyithus Hluttaw, Amyotha Hluttaw and Region
and State Hluttaws. Thus, the NUP has no further suggestions on them. The NUP
finds the basic principle “The Region or State Hluttaw may declare the seat of
the Region or State Hluttaw member vacant in accord with the rules prescribed if
he is absent, without asking the Region or State Hluttaws for leave, from a
session of the Region or State Hluttaw for at least 15 consecutive days. In
computing the absent 15 days from a session of the Region or State Hluttaw, the
postponed period of the session shall not be included” appropriate as the
members who are residing within the territory of the Region or State concerned
are not likely to face transport difficulties if compared with the members of
the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Pyithu Hluttaw and Amyotha Hluttaw. The seat should be
declared vacant only after investigating the cause of his absence.
The detailed basic principles “ A Region or State Hluttaw
shall have the power to act despite some vacancies in the membership. Any
functions in the Hluttaw shall be valid notwithstanding that it is exposed
subsequently that an unentitled person attended a session, voted, or took part
in the functions.”, “The activities and records of the Region and State Hluttaw
shall be released for the knowledge of the people. However, the activities and
records that shall be restricted under an act or the order of the Region and
State Hluttaws shall not be released” and “Region or State Hluttaws have the
right to make laws that cover entire or part of the region or state in the
matters stated in the Region or State Legislative List” are appropriate.
The detailed basic principles concerning to invest a Region
or State level body formed under the Constitution with the power to release
bylaws, rules and regulations derived from that law, and the abolishment or
amendment of the by-law, rule or regulation not in conformity with the
provisions of the law concerned are suitable for the Constitution. Concerning
the detailed basic principle “If Region or State Hluttaw decides to nullify or
amend a bylaw, rule or regulation, it shall not harm the matters carried out
before abrogation of the by-law, rule or regulation” the root cause of the
mistake and its losses should be studied.
Matters that require the approval of the Region or State
Hluttaw, points concerning the submission of bills are appropriate.
But, I would like to discuss the detailed basic principle
“Region and State Hluttaws shall make a decision if Region and State governments
submit budget of Region or State in accord with the procedures prescribed”. We
would like to add the word “discussion” as the matter of presenting annual
budgets, and bill is important. Thus detailed basic principle should be read
“Region and State Hluttaws shall make a discussion and decision if Region and
State governments submit budget of Region or State in accord with the procedures
prescribed.”
In our view, the Chief Minister should have the power to give
comments on the bills sent by the Region or State Hluttaw concerned. The rights
of members of Region and State Hluttaws to discuss and vote and explain the
matters concerning bills are appropriate. The powers and function of the
Speakers of the Region and State Hluttaws are in conformity with those of the
Hluttaws at central level.
In addition, they help implement the tasks of Region or State
Hluttaws. Concerning the physical assaults, the party would like to state the
detailed basic principle concerned as follows:
“(c) action shall be taken against members and persons stated
in the paragraph (a) and (b) in accord with the rules and regulation of the
Region or State Hluttaw and laws if they commit physical assaults.”
As the points contained in the detailed basic principle No 22
and its sub-paras are in conformity with the detailed basic principles of the
Hluttaws at central level, we have no further discussion concerning them.
Moreover, the NUP finds the detailed basic principle No 23 appropriate.
The detailed basic principles for the legislation of
Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, Pyithu Hluttaw, Amyotha Hluttaw and Region and State
Hluttaws, presented by Chairman of the National Convention Convening Work
Committee are found to be in accord with the nation’s objective conditions.
The Work Committee presented them after tho-roughly studying
the constitutions of the world nations, the 1947 Constitution and the 1974
Constitution. The detailed basic principles are also within the framework of the
six objectives of the National Convention and 104 basic principles laid down by
the Convention.
Thus, the detailed basic principles concerning the
legislation of the Hluttaws at all levels presented by the Work Committee
Chairman are appropriate for the Constitution. The NUP would like to make a
request to consider its suggestion as necessary for the interests of the nation
and people.